Senegal Appeal to Court of Arbitration for Sport After AFCON Title Revocation

Total Views : 10
Zoom In Zoom Out Read Later Print

Senegal have formally lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) following the controversial decision to strip them of their Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) title and award it to Morocco.

The ruling, delivered last week by an appeal board of the Confederation of African Football (CAF), overturned Senegal’s 1–0 victory in the final and instead imposed a 3–0 defeat. The decision was based on a finding that Senegal had forfeited the match after briefly leaving the pitch in protest against a contentious penalty awarded to hosts Morocco during stoppage time.

CAS has confirmed that proceedings have now been initiated by the Senegalese Football Federation (FSF), which is seeking to have the CAF decision annulled and for Senegal to be reinstated as champions. The federation has also requested the immediate suspension of the deadline for submitting its full appeal brief until CAF provides a detailed explanation of its ruling.

An arbitral panel will be appointed to hear the case, although CAS has indicated that the complexity of the legal process makes it difficult to establish a clear timeline. The body noted that the duration of proceedings will depend on the time required for both parties to submit their arguments and supporting evidence.

In a statement, CAS Director General Matthieu Reeb emphasised the organisation’s capability to handle such disputes, stating that the court is well-equipped to manage the case with the support of independent and highly qualified arbitrators.

He added that while there is significant anticipation among supporters and stakeholders for a final verdict, every effort will be made to ensure the matter is resolved as swiftly as possible, without compromising the right of all parties to a fair and thorough hearing.

The outcome of the appeal is expected to have significant implications for African football, as Senegal seek to overturn one of the most contentious decisions in the tournament’s recent history.