Kellogg's Had Attempted To The Sue The Government, Claiming That Their Cereals Weren't Packed With Excess Amounts Of Sugar And Artificial Sweeteners.
Royal Courts Of Justice Rule In Favour Of The Government Against Kellogg's Over Sugary Cereals
The cereal magnate Kellogg's has lost it's battle against the British government over promoting sugary cereals, after the Royal Court of Justice in London ruled in favour of the government.
The
lawsuit from Kellogg's came after the government implemented a law
restricting the in store advertisement of sugar filled cereals,
restricting them to a middle of the enisle position on grocery store
shelves.
This
Kellogg's claimed was: “An act by the British government to
decrease much needed profits during this era of Covid-19 and out of
control inflation”.
The
breakfast food company claimed that the use of dry state measuring of
their sugary cereals didn't reflect the actual amount of sugar a kid
or young adult would consume after adding milk, a claim the court
ruled as: “False”.
Kellogg's
has reacted to the verdict by saying: “We're disappointed with the
ruling.
It
makes very little sense to us that consumers can still by sugary
doughnuts and sweets, which are still in prime in store advertising
spots, yet breakfast cereals are deemed to be the source of childhood
obesity.
What's
stopping people from adding in their own sugar at home?
Absolutely
nothing”.
In
contrast a spokesman from the Department of Health and Social Care
stated that: “With the combined force of volume price restrictions,
sugar taxes, and non-promoting placements in supermarkets.
These
changes will protect children up and down the country from products
high in fat, sugar, and/or salt”.